Group theory·OpenAI Math·Result 251·Lean formalisation listed

Amenability, unitarizability, and strong Ulam stability

One of the 372 results in OpenAI's public mathematics catalogue, filed under group theory: 2 preprints, the latest dated 5 October 2026. This page quotes OpenAI's own summary of the claim, links the papers and abstracts, and will embed the animation.

Latest paper

Unitarizability implies amenability for discrete groups

23 September 2026 · PDF

The animation for this result has not been released yet. Subscribe on YouTube to catch it.

What OpenAI claims

Resolves Dixmier's problem for all discrete groups: amenability is equivalent to every uniformly bounded Hilbert-space representation being similar to a unitary representation. For countable discrete groups, amenability is also equivalent to strong Ulam stability: sufficiently accurate unitary approximate representations are uniformly close in operator norm to genuine representations on the same, possibly infinite-dimensional, Hilbert space. (Lean)

Papers (2)

  1. Unitarizability implies amenability for discrete groups

    · Preprint, not peer reviewed · PDF

    We prove that a discrete group is amenable if and only if every uniformly bounded representation on a complex Hilbert space is similar to a unitary representation. This resolves Dixmier's unitarizability problem affirmatively for discrete groups.

  2. Strong Ulam Stability Characterizes Amenability

    · Preprint, not peer reviewed · PDF

    A countable discrete group is amenable if and only if it is strongly Ulam stable: every sufficiently accurate unitary almost representation, on any complex Hilbert space, is uniformly close in operator norm to a genuine representation on the same space. We prove the converse to Kazhdan's amenable stability theorem, answering the question of Burger, Ozawa, and Thom. The inclusion of infinite-dimensional Hilbert spaces is essential.

Status

Preprint. The papers have not been independently reviewed. Treat the result as OpenAI's claim until other mathematicians have checked it. If a video exists, it illustrates the statement; it is not the proof.

Related results in Group theory

All 14 results in Group theory →