Combinatorics·OpenAI Math·Result 189·Lean formalisation listed
Cycle–clique Ramsey numbers
One of the 372 results in OpenAI's public mathematics catalogue, filed under combinatorics: 1 preprint, the latest dated 25 September 2026. This page quotes OpenAI's own summary of the claim, links the paper and abstract, and will embed the animation.
Latest paper
Cycle--clique Ramsey numbers
The animation for this result has not been released yet. Subscribe on YouTube to catch it.
What OpenAI claims
Proves the Erdős–Faudree–Rousseau–Schelp conjecture: R(Cm,Kn)=(m-1)(n-1)+1 for every m ≥ n ≥ 3, except R(C3,K3)=6. This is the exact threshold forcing a red m-cycle or a blue n-clique in every red–blue coloring of a complete graph. (Lean)
Paper
Cycle--clique Ramsey numbers
We prove that R(Cm,Kn)=(m-1)(n-1)+1 for every pair of integers m ≥ n ≥ 3 other than (m,n)=(3,3), for which R(C3,K3)=6. This establishes the cycle–clique conjecture of Erdős, Faudree, Rousseau and Schelp. The proof combines expansion in a minimal counterexample with a large-clique lemma and an optimization of paths joining clique vertices. These arguments reduce the remaining cases to 3,099 finite parameter-pattern instances, which are excluded by two exact implementations of proved inference rules. Complete programs and deduction traces accompany the paper.
Status
Preprint. The paper has not been independently reviewed. Treat the result as OpenAI's claim until other mathematicians have checked it. If a video exists, it illustrates the statement; it is not the proof.
Related results in Combinatorics
- 190Polynomial removal fails for ordered binary matricesLean
- 191A power improvement in the Heilbronn triangle lower boundLean
- 192Boolean functions violate the square-root degree bound by arbitrary factorsLean
- 155A counterexample to periodic tiling in dimension threeLean
- 156Borsuk's conjecture fails in dimension nineLean
- 157Graph coloring, clique minors, and Colin de Verdière invariantsLean