Topology·OpenAI Math·Result 307·Lean formalisation listed

Failure of rational injectivity for maximal coarse assembly

One of the 372 results in OpenAI's public mathematics catalogue, filed under topology: 2 preprints, the latest dated 5 October 2026. This page quotes OpenAI's own summary of the claim, links the papers and abstracts, and will embed the animation.

Latest paper

Failure of rational injectivity for maximal coarse assembly

5 October 2026 · PDF

The animation for this result has not been released yet. Subscribe on YouTube to catch it.

What OpenAI claims

Constructs a uniformly discrete bounded-geometry space whose maximal coarse assembly map is not rationally injective. The example is a coarse disjoint union of finite connected graphs of uniformly bounded degree, with an infinite-order kernel class. A companion gives the analogous failure for reduced coarse assembly, disproving the rational coarse Novikov conjecture. (Lean)

Papers (2)

  1. Failure of rational injectivity for maximal coarse assembly

    · Preprint, not peer reviewed · PDF

    We construct a uniformly discrete bounded-geometry space whose maximal coarse assembly map has an infinite-order element in its kernel. The space is a coarse disjoint union of finite connected graphs of uniformly bounded degree, so maximal coarse assembly need not be rationally injective even for such graph unions.

  2. A counterexample to the coarse Novikov conjecture

    · Preprint, not peer reviewed · PDF

    We disprove the coarse Novikov conjecture: ordinary coarse assembly need not be rationally injective for uniformly discrete spaces of bounded geometry. We construct a coarse disjoint union of finite graphs of uniformly bounded degree and an infinite-order class in its degree-one coarse K-homology whose image under ordinary coarse assembly in the K-theory of the reduced, locally compact Roe algebra vanishes.

Status

Preprint. The papers have not been independently reviewed. Treat the result as OpenAI's claim until other mathematicians have checked it. If a video exists, it illustrates the statement; it is not the proof.

Related results in Topology

All 18 results in Topology →